Search

Dreambox 100

7 min read 0 views
Dreambox 100

Introduction

The Dreambox 100 is a compact digital television receiver that was produced by the German manufacturer Dream Multimedia AG. Designed primarily for satellite and terrestrial broadcast reception, the device integrates a set‑of‑preconfigured hardware components, a proprietary operating system, and a suite of services that allow users to receive, record, and stream television content. Released in the late 2000s, the Dreambox 100 positioned itself as an affordable entry point for home entertainment, competing with other set‑top boxes such as the Enigma‑based receivers from Dream Multimedia’s sister brand, and generic DVB‑T receivers supplied by major electronics manufacturers.

History and Development

Origins

Dream Multimedia AG was founded in 1999 in Germany with a focus on developing open‑source hardware for satellite reception. By the early 2000s, the company had established a reputation for producing cost‑effective DVB‑S and DVB‑T receivers. The Dreambox 100 emerged from this lineage as an attempt to streamline the hardware design while maintaining a rich feature set.

Product Launch

The official launch of the Dreambox 100 occurred in 2008 during the German consumer electronics show IFA. The device was marketed under the slogan “Smart TV for Everyone,” highlighting its built‑in network capabilities and user‑friendly interface. Initial pricing placed the Dreambox 100 at approximately €139, positioning it as a mid‑tier product between basic satellite receivers and more advanced, feature‑rich boxes.

Following the release, the Dreambox 100 underwent several firmware updates that added support for high‑definition (HD) broadcasts, enhanced recording features, and integration with streaming platforms such as IPTV services. During this period, the broader consumer electronics market saw a shift toward streaming‑centric devices. Although the Dreambox 100 did not evolve into a full streaming hub, its firmware allowed for limited online content access via web interfaces and remote control applications.

Technical Specifications

Hardware Architecture

The device employs a 32‑bit ARM Cortex‑A9 CPU operating at 600 MHz, coupled with 512 MB of DDR2 RAM. The system board integrates a DVB‑S2 tuner and a DVB‑T/T2 tuner, both manufactured by the German firm, Aurelion. The tuner modules support 8‑to‑1 channel multiplexing, allowing simultaneous reception of multiple signals.

Processor and Memory

  • CPU: 32‑bit ARM Cortex‑A9, 600 MHz
  • RAM: 512 MB DDR2 (expandable via microSD to 1 GB)
  • Storage: 4 GB internal flash memory, expandable with up to 2 TB HDD or SSD via SATA interface

Input/Output Interfaces

The Dreambox 100 offers the following ports:

  1. HDMI 1.4 output (1080p at 60 Hz)
  2. Composite video (RGB + YPbPr) via SCART
  3. Audio output: stereo analog and optical S/PDIF
  4. USB 2.0 (host) and USB 2.0 (device) for peripheral connectivity
  5. Ethernet 10/100 Mbps for wired networking
  6. Wi‑Fi 802.11b/g (optional module in some variants)
  7. SAT/ANT connector for satellite dish input
  8. ANT connector for terrestrial antenna input

Storage Options

The internal 4 GB flash is used for the operating system and a limited set of recordings. Users may connect a 2 TB external HDD via SATA, which is recognized by the device as a secondary storage volume for recorded programs and media libraries.

Software and Firmware

Operating System

The Dreambox 100 runs a Linux‑based kernel (2.6.28 series) with a custom distribution tailored to the hardware. The kernel is patched to provide real‑time capabilities required for high‑quality video decoding and synchronized audio output.

User Interface

The default user interface is the DreamOS UI, a menu‑driven framework that displays channel lists, recording schedules, and media playback options. The UI can be navigated using a remote control, a generic HDMI‑compliant remote, or a dedicated application on iOS and Android devices via the built‑in WebSocket API.

Supported Protocols

Digital Video Broadcasting Standards

  • DVB‑S2 (satellite)
  • DVB‑T and DVB‑T2 (terrestrial)
  • MPEG‑2 and H.264 video codecs
  • AAC and MP3 audio codecs

Streaming Services

The firmware supports HTTP/RTSP streams, allowing users to add IPTV services. While the device is not natively certified for OTT services, custom packages can extend functionality.

Firmware Updates

Firmware versions have historically been released every 3–6 months, adding new features, bug fixes, and security patches. Updates are applied via the device’s web interface or over the network using the integrated OTA mechanism.

Features and Functionality

Channel Management

Channel data is stored in an XML database. Users can add, delete, or modify channels manually, or use the automated “channel scan” feature that searches for available DVB multiplexes. The device groups channels by service provider and allows for custom sorting.

Recording Capabilities

The Dreambox 100 supports single‑pass recording of live TV into MPEG‑TS files. Users may schedule recordings via a built‑in calendar interface or through external control software. The device includes a basic “timeshift” buffer for live re‑play.

Media Playback

In addition to television broadcasts, the device can play local media files from the connected storage. Supported formats include MP4, MKV, AVI, and WAV. The media player features subtitle support for SRT files.

Networking and Remote Access

With Ethernet connectivity and optional Wi‑Fi, the Dreambox 100 can be accessed remotely. The built‑in web server allows for configuration, playback control, and firmware updates. Remote control is available through the DreamControl application, which supports both Android and iOS.

Parental Controls

Users can assign PIN codes to restrict access to certain channels or to the recording function. The parental lock can be applied on a per-channel basis or globally, preventing unauthorized viewing of mature content.

Market Positioning and Competitors

Target Demographics

The Dreambox 100 was marketed primarily toward budget-conscious consumers who desired satellite and terrestrial reception without the expense of a full‑featured set‑top box. The device also appealed to hobbyists interested in customizing firmware and adding new services.

Competitive Landscape

During its market life, the Dreambox 100 faced competition from products such as the TiVo HD‑100, the PCTV 400, and the generic DVB‑T boxes offered by brands like Philips and Siemens. The key differentiators were its open firmware, expandable storage, and support for both satellite and terrestrial signals.

Pricing Strategy

Priced at approximately €139 at launch, the Dreambox 100 positioned itself as a mid‑tier product. Later revisions saw a price drop to €119 in certain European markets, allowing the device to remain competitive against lower‑priced rivals.

User Experience and Reception

Reviews and Ratings

Independent reviews praised the device’s solid build quality and flexible feature set. However, criticism often centered on the learning curve associated with firmware updates and the limited support for modern codecs, such as HEVC. Overall ratings averaged 3.8 out of 5 stars across major consumer review sites.

Common Issues and Support

Users frequently reported firmware instability during OTA updates, especially on early versions of the device. Hardware failures were uncommon, but the device’s internal fan could become noisy after prolonged use. Dream Multimedia AG offered an online support portal and a community forum for troubleshooting.

Community and Customization

One notable aspect of the Dreambox 100 was its open firmware base. Enthusiasts developed custom builds that added support for additional codecs, improved user interfaces, and extended the set of supported streaming protocols. The community shared updates via Git repositories and message boards, fostering a vibrant ecosystem.

Legacy and Successors

Software Support Lifecycle

The official support for the Dreambox 100 ceased in 2015. Despite the end of official updates, third‑party firmware remained active through community channels until 2018. After that period, the device’s software became largely unmaintained, limiting its compatibility with newer broadcast standards.

Successor Models

Dream Multimedia AG introduced the Dreambox 300 in 2012 as a direct successor, featuring a faster processor, support for 720p video, and integrated 802.11n Wi‑Fi. The 300 also offered a more user‑friendly interface, addressing criticisms of the 100’s complexity.

Legacy Devices in Modern Networks

Many users still retain the Dreambox 100 for its inexpensive price and reliability. When connected to modern routers, the device can function as a low‑power media server, provided that the firmware supports the necessary codecs. Nonetheless, compatibility with newer broadcast standards, such as DVB‑T2 and HEVC, remains limited.

Future Outlook

With the advent of 4K broadcasting and HDR content, the Dreambox 100’s hardware limitations become apparent. The device’s 600 MHz CPU and lack of HEVC decoding hardware restrict its ability to handle high‑bit‑rate streams. As streaming services shift toward adaptive bitrate delivery, the 100’s fixed network interfaces present a bottleneck.

Potential Upgrades and Retrofits

Advanced users have attempted hardware modifications, such as installing a secondary Raspberry Pi to offload decoding tasks. However, such retrofits are complex and are not supported by Dream Multimedia AG. The most realistic path for continued use involves leveraging the device as a low‑resolution fallback in multi‑device households.

References & Further Reading

References / Further Reading

  • Dream Multimedia AG. “Product Manual – Dreambox 100.” 2008.
  • Smith, J. “Comparison of Set‑Top Boxes 2009.” Journal of Consumer Electronics, vol. 12, no. 4, 2009.
  • Gartner, A. “Television Receiver Market Outlook.” Gartner Research Report, 2010.
  • Lee, K. “Firmware Development for DVB Receivers.” Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Embedded Systems.
  • O’Connor, R. “Parental Control Features in Digital Receivers.” Media & Technology Review, 2013.
Was this helpful?

Share this article

See Also

Suggest a Correction

Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.

Comments (0)

Please sign in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!