Introduction
CoolWebAwards was a web-based platform that operated from 1997 to 2005, dedicated to recognizing and promoting innovative, creative, and high-quality websites worldwide. The site was established by Jeff W. Larkin, a former marketing professional who observed a growing need for an independent body that could evaluate websites on a range of aesthetic, functional, and technical criteria. CoolWebAwards gained a reputation as a respected authority in the early days of the World Wide Web, where design trends and web technologies were evolving rapidly.
The website presented a collection of annual award categories, each highlighting distinct aspects of web design, such as graphics, usability, and creative storytelling. In addition to the awards themselves, CoolWebAwards maintained an archive of winning sites, editorial commentary, and industry news. The platform also fostered a community of designers and developers, offering resources, tutorials, and a forum for discussion. Although the site ceased operations in 2005, its influence persisted in the broader discourse on web design excellence.
History and Background
Founding and Early Vision
In the late 1990s, the internet was still in its formative phase. Designers were experimenting with multimedia, interactive elements, and emerging standards such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Against this backdrop, Jeff W. Larkin recognized a gap: a consistent, unbiased method for evaluating and celebrating exemplary websites. Larkin founded CoolWebAwards in 1997, launching it as a free, community-driven platform that encouraged public nominations and independent judging.
From its inception, the awards were driven by the principle that creativity should be recognized regardless of a site's commercial status. This inclusive philosophy allowed both small independent designers and larger corporate sites to compete on equal footing, thereby enriching the diversity of entries.
Growth and Expansion
Throughout the late 1990s and early 2000s, CoolWebAwards expanded its reach by adding new categories, collaborating with industry partners, and hosting live events. The site quickly attracted a global audience, with entries submitted from more than 60 countries. A notable milestone occurred in 1999 when CoolWebAwards partnered with the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) to sponsor a joint awards event, thereby raising its profile within the advertising and marketing sectors.
The platform also began to publish monthly roundups of emerging web design trends, providing industry professionals with timely insights. By 2002, the awards had become a staple reference for designers, with many referencing CoolWebAwards winners in academic research and professional portfolios.
Decline and Closure
Despite its early success, CoolWebAwards faced mounting challenges in the mid-2000s. The proliferation of other web awards, such as the Webby Awards and the Awwwards, created a more crowded marketplace. Additionally, changes in web technologies, including the rise of responsive design and mobile-first development, required rapid adaptation. Larkin and the site’s editorial team struggled to keep pace with these shifts, both technologically and financially.
In 2005, after a decision to discontinue operations was announced, the CoolWebAwards website was archived. While the site was closed, its database of winning entries was preserved by web archives, allowing continued reference to its catalog of historic web design achievements.
Award Criteria and Process
Categories
CoolWebAwards organized its recognitions into distinct categories that reflected key facets of web design and development. The main categories included:
- Best Graphic Design
- Best Interactive Feature
- Best Use of Multimedia
- Best Usability
- Best Content Strategy
- Most Innovative Web Site
- Best Mobile Site
Each category aimed to assess a combination of aesthetic quality, technical execution, and user experience. In addition to these categories, a “Cool Web Site of the Year” award was presented annually to a site that exemplified overall excellence.
Nomination and Submission
Sites could be nominated by the public or selected by a panel of judges. Public nominations were submitted through an online form, requiring the URL, a brief description, and the nominee’s rationale. The nomination period typically opened in late summer and closed in early fall, allowing judges to review entries before the awards ceremony.
Submission guidelines emphasized transparency and fairness. Nominators were required to verify that the nominated site was active and that they had the right to submit it. This policy helped maintain the credibility of the awards and reduce instances of duplicate or disqualified entries.
Judging Panel
The judging panel consisted of a mix of industry professionals, academics, and design critics. Panel members were chosen based on their expertise in web design, development, marketing, and user experience. The panel operated under a structured scoring system, evaluating each entry on criteria such as visual appeal, originality, technical performance, and usability.
Scores were anonymized and aggregated to produce a final ranking for each category. In cases of ties, the panel employed a runoff voting process. The final results were published on the CoolWebAwards website, accompanied by editorial commentary and critiques of the winning sites.
Judging Transparency
CoolWebAwards maintained a commitment to transparency by publishing the scoring rubric and explaining the decision-making process. This approach distinguished the site from other awards that were perceived as opaque or overly commercial. While the platform did not disclose individual panel members’ scores to preserve privacy, it provided a general overview of how each criterion influenced the final decision.
Notable Winners
Design and Usability Milestones
Over its operational years, CoolWebAwards recognized a number of websites that have become landmark references in web design history. Some of the most notable winners include:
- ABC Design Lab (2001) – Awarded for Best Interactive Feature for its groundbreaking use of Flash animation and custom navigation.
- GreenTech Initiative (2003) – Received Best Usability for a clean, intuitive interface that made complex data accessible to non-experts.
- Digital Nomads (2004) – Honored for Best Graphic Design for its minimalist aesthetic combined with striking imagery.
- EduVision (2002) – Won Best Content Strategy for its modular structure and clear educational messaging.
These examples illustrate the breadth of innovation celebrated by CoolWebAwards, ranging from interactive storytelling to data visualization and educational content.
Global Impact
The awards’ international reach contributed to cross-cultural diffusion of design ideas. Sites from regions such as Asia, Africa, and South America were frequently featured, offering alternative perspectives on visual storytelling and usability. This global dimension fostered an appreciation for diverse aesthetic traditions and localized user needs.
Impact on Web Design
Standard-Setting Role
CoolWebAwards played a formative role in shaping early web design standards. By publicly acknowledging excellence in various technical and creative domains, the awards set benchmarks for designers worldwide. For example, the consistent emphasis on usability in early awards helped elevate usability as a critical metric during the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Similarly, the focus on graphic design encouraged designers to experiment with high-resolution imagery, gradient effects, and custom typography. The site’s editorial commentary often highlighted emerging design techniques, thereby influencing contemporary best practices.
Educational Influence
Educational institutions frequently used CoolWebAwards archives as teaching resources. Course modules on web design and development incorporated award-winning sites as case studies to illustrate effective use of layout, navigation, and content hierarchy. The site’s detailed critiques offered students insight into the rationale behind design decisions, providing a bridge between theory and practice.
Furthermore, the platform’s open nomination process gave students a sense of agency and a platform to showcase their own projects. Many participants gained early recognition that aided their subsequent professional careers.
Industry Networking
The annual awards ceremony served as a networking hub for professionals across disciplines. Designers, developers, marketers, and business executives converged to celebrate achievements, exchange ideas, and discuss emerging trends. Many collaborations and partnerships originated from interactions at CoolWebAwards events.
In addition to the main ceremony, the platform hosted workshops and panel discussions that explored topics such as emerging web standards, the role of user experience in branding, and the integration of multimedia elements. These educational sessions reinforced the awards’ mission to promote continuous learning and innovation.
Criticisms and Controversies
Subjectivity in Judging
Despite its efforts at transparency, CoolWebAwards faced criticism over perceived subjectivity in the judging process. Critics argued that personal taste and prevailing design trends could unduly influence scores, especially in categories with high creative latitude such as Best Graphic Design.
To address these concerns, the site occasionally invited external experts to review the panel’s decisions. However, the lack of a formal, reproducible scoring algorithm limited the capacity to quantify objectivity fully.
Commercial Influences
Another point of contention involved the relationship between the awards and corporate sponsors. While sponsorships were essential for funding events and maintaining operations, skeptics questioned whether sponsorship could bias the selection of winners or the promotion of certain design trends aligned with sponsor interests.
The organization maintained a strict policy separating sponsor involvement from the judging panel. Nonetheless, the perception of potential conflict of interest remained a recurring concern among critics.
Digital Preservation
CoolWebAwards’ closure raised questions regarding the preservation of its digital archive. Many of the original site’s pages were lost due to server decommissioning, leading to gaps in the historical record. While web archives preserved some content, the completeness of the database was compromised. Scholars and historians later faced challenges in accessing certain award entries and related editorial commentary.
Legacy and Closure
Archival Efforts
Following the site’s shutdown, several volunteer groups and academic institutions took steps to preserve the CoolWebAwards archive. Through web archival services, a substantial portion of the original content was retrieved, including award listings, editorial reviews, and design case studies.
These preserved materials have been made available to the public, allowing researchers and enthusiasts to examine the evolution of web design trends over the period of the awards’ operation.
Influence on Subsequent Awards
The framework and criteria pioneered by CoolWebAwards informed the development of later web award programs. Many subsequent platforms adopted a similar multi-category structure and sought to emulate its emphasis on usability and content strategy. The focus on open nominations and public engagement became a common feature among contemporary awards.
Additionally, the practice of publishing detailed critiques of winning sites created a model for transparency that many modern award bodies have integrated into their processes.
Related Initiatives
Webby Awards
Launched in 1996, the Webby Awards initially focused on excellence in web design and innovation. While both organizations shared similar goals, the Webby Awards emphasized a broader definition of digital excellence, including social media, mobile apps, and streaming services. The Webby Awards established a more formalized jury system and expanded its scope as the internet evolved.
Awwwards
Established in 2004, Awwwards is a web design community that provides annual recognitions based on design, usability, creativity, and content. Awwwards incorporated user voting alongside expert jury assessments, creating a hybrid evaluation model. The platform’s emphasis on responsive design and progressive web apps reflects contemporary industry priorities.
CSS Design Awards
Founded in 2010, CSS Design Awards focuses on CSS-based design, celebrating sites that demonstrate mastery of front-end technologies. The awards recognize sites for design, creativity, and technical skill, and provide a detailed review process that examines code quality, performance, and accessibility.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!